Landlord Lost Lease!!?
Tags:co worker, employee application, eviction notice, jugde, lease agreement,
5
Okay so, initial off im from Phoenix, Az. Me as well as my partner as well as her 2 kids changed in to an unit 04/01/2009. We sealed a lease. My partner afterwards got hired by a unit complex. Keep in thoughts her trainer is a friend. By removing hired, upon her worker application, it states… Upon being hired, it is fortuitous for an worker to have giveaway rent. So you had giveaway franchise for awhile. Then a dog had puppies. Her trainer asked to have one. When they were aged sufficient to leave you asked her regularly to come get a puppy. We gave her most chances. So when she did not, i gave a puppy to a friend. Her trainer afterwards got pissed as well as released us a 5 day notice to compensate franchise or be evicted. We asked for a franchise as well as a duplicate of it as well as she took it out of a bureau as well as someway mislaid it. So she cut us a deal, half a rent. We paid once. My partner went to a sanatorium a single night, called a office, which no manger was in, as well as spoke with her co-worker to let her know she wouldnt be entrance in. My partner afterwards found out a subsequent day she was dismissed for no call, no show. Now they released us an eviction notice to pierce out asap due to no franchise agreement. Little did she know you had a duplicate of it. So you won which justice date. While there they asked a jugde if they could sue us for behind franchise from when you initial changed in. The decider pronounced no, usually for september. Now you got an additional 5 day to compensate or be evicted usually final week. Our justice date is upon 10/05/2009. Same justice as well as judge. And upon a notice they’re perplexing to sue for a behind rent. Now recollect she mislaid a franchise agreement. So what do i have entrance outta this subsequent justice date? She doesnt have a franchise to infer anything. Will me as well as my partner additionally win this case?
We have not paid Sept.’s rent. But, a decider did contend they had to pierce a duplicate of a franchise to a justice date. Which they do not have. We usually have a duplicate of a initial page of a lease. But technically isn’t a unit formidable violation a franchise by not carrying a copy/original upon file? They have no proof.
We have papers display giveaway franchise to any particular employee. Also you have papers saying which she favors sure people. Her father for instance, was not an worker as well as got giveaway rent, explanation for that. Also, multiform employees which had been fired, did not have to pierce asap, as well as still to this day get FREE RENT!!! Im contemptible though im not seeking for a giveaway ride, though it doesnt appear satisfactory during all. The reason she was dismissed in a initial place is unreasonable. She was dismissed as well as us being forced to pierce is out of spite. Its crazy. And you have copiousness of request to infer some-more than what is usually pronounced upon here.
Incoming search terms for the article:
- landlord lost lease
- lost lease agreement
- lost lease
- im a landlord lost contract
- original lease agreement lost
Related solution post:
- I don't have a lease with my landlord, my roommate is never home, he wants to move someone else in, can he?
- My job needs me in FL, my lease in PG county in MD is till Dec,how do I avoid 2mths rent payment to end lease?
- Error on apartment lease agreement found, Can he get out of the agreement using this??
- Can I break my lease in pa if my landlord is not repairing a water (rain) leak into house?
- Can former employer/landlord evict me? ……………………… PLEASE NO DUMB ANSWERS THIS IS VERY SERIOUS?
Did you pay Septembers rent??? If not, then you can be evicted for failure to pay as the judge stated.
You may win the case if you show up with Sept. & Oct.’s rent payments.
None of us has a copy of your lease. Nobody can answer your question without knowing the terms of your lease. And, the only thing you’ve said that is pertinent to anything, is "we have a lease…" Too vague for any meaningful answer.
When she got fired you lost the right to free rent and MUST pay. The lack of paperwork does not change that. They can always claim a verbal month to month lease which is just as enforceable and requires no paperwork.
The judge already said they can sue you for September rent, so what makes you think you can go against that? Judges do not let tenants get away with crap over clerical errors.
You did not pay September rent and you are in default regardless of wether they lost the lease or not.You are about to be kicked out into the street. Basically your residency was based on your girlfriend working for the complex. You can’t live there for free and you should have paid Septembers rent.This is about the stupidest thing i’ve read today,Grow up and pay your own way and stop trying to be a bum and get a free ride.
Start with research: (My apologies, I would know the sites to get this information if you were from CA)
1) Determine Landlord/Tenant rights for your state. Ensure that you have followed all your obligations for the periods in which you 4 were only renters. (pre and post job)
2) Determine Labor laws applicable to special agreements. Was a written agreement required regarding the free rent? Does her job description or the company’s internal HR policy state anything pertaining to the free rent deals?
3) Unfortunately, not paying the rent for Sept. may reflect badly… It can show you don’t always fulfill your obligations. It is usually better to pay and be reimbursed for a questionable debt.
Best thing to do is to determine who has broken what laws based on what was required, and reiterate them to the judge. If you have broken any laws, be sure to state why; especially if this manager is the reason those were broken. If you made extra efforts at all that were not required of you, be sure to tell the judge of those instances as well. He may determine that "hey, they did all they could in the circumstance… the manager has no claim…" If not, at least you now know the laws and can protect yourself from further instances such as this one.
***** With regard to update *****
Better to worry about the situation between the manager and yourselves. The phrase: "Life isn’t always fair." comes to mind. For the case you are in right now, your not proving that she doesn’t treat people equally, just that her treatment of you was unlawful. Frankly, the judge can’t do anything based on "That’s not fair!". He needs a law or documentation to help him make the correct decision. You could always persue a counter suit later based on how she treated you, depending on the laws in your state, of course.