Current Events: 9/11 Conspiracy Questions? Why Not Believe It Was a Conspiracy?
Tags:commercial airlines, devout muslims, henry kissinger, john o neill, strange pattern,
13
9/11 – The Basic Questions
1. Why didn’t jets prevent a airliners given they had countless warnings of militant attacks?
2. Why did Ashcroft stop drifting blurb airlines, citing an unclear "threat" in Jul 2001?
3. Why did FEMA distortion about their participation in New York upon 9/11?
4. Why didn’t a Secret Service dispatch Dubya out of a classroom?
5. Why did George H.W. Bush encounter garbage garbage bin Laden’s hermit upon 9/11?
6. Why did passengers or crewmembers upon 3 of a flights all make make use of of a tenure boxcutters?
7. Where have been a moody recorders?
8. Why were a FISA warrants discontinued?
9. How did Bush see a initial craft pile-up upon live camera?
10 Why was confidence assembly scheduled for 9/11 cancelled by WTC government upon 9/10?
11. How did they come up with a "culprits" so quickly?
12. How did they find a terrorist’s cars during a airports so quickly?
13. Why did Shrub disintegrate a Bin Laden Task Force?
14. Why a bizarre settlement of waste from Flight 93?
15. How endless was a attribute in in between a Taliban, a ISI as well as a CIA?
16. What only was a purpose of Henry Kissinger during UNOCAL?
17. When was it motionless to terminate office building a tube from Turkmenistan by Afghanistan to Pakistan?
18. Why did a FBI in 1996 tighten a files to examine Osama garbage garbage bin Laden’s kin in Washington?
19. Why did .Bush stop inquiries in to militant connectors of a Bin Laden family in early 2001?
20. Who done a preference to have John O’Neill stop questioning Al-qeada accounts?
21. Who gave a preference to give him a confidence pursuit during a World Trade Center?
22. Did John O’Neill encounter any a single of a FEMA in a night of Sep 10th?
23. What about media reports which hijackers paid for tickets for flights scheduled after Sept. 11?
24. Why did nothing of a nineteen hijackers crop up upon a newcomer lists?
25. Why would righteous Muslims visit bars, splash alcoholic beverages as well as leave their bibles?
26. Why would a hijackers make make use of of credit cards as well as concede drivers licenses with photos to be zeroxed?
27. Why did a hijackers force passengers to call relatives?
28. How did a hijackers shift a moody devise but law coercion or a troops try to stop them?
29. How did a hijackers pass miraculously crop up nearby a WTC? Who found it as well as what time?
30. How could a FBI heed in in between "regular" Muslims as well as hijacker Muslims upon those flights?
31. Why was there not a single "innocent" Muslim upon house any of these flights?
32. Did someone go by a newcomer lists seeking for Muslim names as well as tag them as hijackers?
JUST A COINCIDENCE?
YEAH RIGHT!
THE BLACK BOXES AND CRASH VIDEO
42. Why were a Black Boxes never recovered ?
43. Why didn’t a FBI recover a air trade controller’s protocols?
44. Why did a FBI not recover a Flight Data Recorder info?
THE HIJACKERS
45. How did a FBI embrace a tip from a newcomer who boarded a opposite craft as well as reached his end safely which he had a fight with dual ME group during a Logan airfield in Boston?
46. Who sloping a FBI to charge a Westin Hotel in Boston upon Sep 12th?
47. Where did a photos of all nineteen hijackers come from?
48. How were all hijackers identified only 2 days after a attack?
999. WHY DOES THE GOVERNMENT HESISTATE WHEN ANSWERING THESE QUESTIONS?
michael w, What some-more do we need?!?!… we will give we some-more subject when we respond.
Mr. X- Where is your explanation which they have found which Black Box. Where is your link?
Related solution post:
- Current Events: How and why would you not believe that 9/11 was a Conspiracy?
- How do you feel about these current events as they pertain to gender and human rights advocacy…?
- Black people, why is everything about racism?
- AESK.OB what does this mean?
- Answer 4 of the following 10 questions with responses of at least 200 words?
All your "questions "have been answered time and time again, Are you really serious when you suggest that the American government or the FBI knew about this and did nothing ? Try putting a little more water in your drinks .
hmmmmmmm
You need to give up your U.S. citizenship.
Why should we believe all these "points" you made?
Where other then on conspiracy websites or on Anti Bush, liberal websites, is any evidence that these things really happened, as you claim they did?
Anyone can say anything.
I can make "points" too.
What if for example I ask;
#1 Why did Obama meet with Bin Ladin 1 week before the attack?
#2 Why did Saddam Hussein have a parade on 9/10 in which marchers, formed the number 9/11?
#3 Why did Louis Farrakhan tell his followers the day before to "get ready for your big "present" tomorrow ?
And I can go on and on like that, I guess that makes the 3 points I just made above true, right?
i totally agree 100% with manydifferentintrests
Yr questions r providing answers.An inquiry supervised by u,n.o comprising of reputable experts from all over the world,including Muslim world may provide some clues 2 this horrible and mysterious incident.
Hey genius, they did find the black boxes. Maybe if you crawled out of your hole in the ground, you might actually know what was going on!
Plus, if hijacking multiple commercial flights in order to fly them into buildings isn’t a conspiracy, what is?
And finally, unless your retarded you should know that terrorists’ best bet at not being caught is to not act like terrorists. That’s why they went bar hopping and stuff.
I pity the fool!
Anything that’s BIG – really Big like that, never stays a secret very long. WaterGate in the 70s was big. And people began spilling secrets. Anything that is supposed to stay secret never does. I know that 9-11 wasn’t a conspiracy because never at no point has anyone supposed to have been involved, ever stepped up to admit even a small part of something. That would have happened by now. Or someone who heard something from someone involved. None of that has ever surfaced. In past history events, someone has always verbally leaked out something.
Did Louis Farakook really have a march on 9/10? Was Jessie Jackson in attendance?
I BELIEVE YOU
who cares?
Just ran through your list of questions and most of them make me ask "Who says these questions are even accurate?" The only places I find making most of those statements are conspiracy sites themselves, and I’ve not found one of those that isn’t full of things I know to be errors and omissions.
But I’ll answer one, which provides an example of the above:
29. How did a hijackers passport miraculously appear near the WTC? Who found it and what time?
First of all, your use of the word "miraculously" automatically negates any notion that you really have an interest in the answer. The person who found it was not identified, as far as I know.
But it’s this little trick of omission that you truther folks use that irritates me the most. It would seem odd, wouldn’t it, if a hijacker’s passport was the ONLY document found from the plane. However, ID’s, a frequent flier card and other personal effects of the passengers were also found–so why is it impossible that a passport was found?
I’ve also seen a ridiculous version that starts this question with "If the plane was completely incinerated, how did…." which is a straw man. The planes were not "completely incinerated". Those of us who were there can testify to seeing fuselage on the Plaza and other plane parts in the area after impact.
I think that’s one of the problems in focusing on the truth about the events of those days, there are just so many anomalies in the official story, that just listing them takes a lot of time. It might have evn been part of the ploy, to not even try to cover up all the obvious flaws in the official story.
There is common ground for all so called 9/11 truthers, such as the demolition of the towers not being a result of the strike and fire, or the lack of a video showing a 757 hitting the Pentagon being hard to explain..
Another problem with lists is that, if someone doesn’t understand logic, they think debunking one question debunks them all-in fact that is the mindset of most people who do swallow the official bs.
That’s not saying this is a bad question, just that I have little faith in the intellectual rigor of those who believe the official story, and whether they’d read it, but maybe bits will sink in, even subconsciously
I haven’t looked at the answers yet, but I’d guess the main argument of those who believe the official narrative would be personal insults.